🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to approve a law raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government committed to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could backfire". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this international debate evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.